01
A mobile app the crew will actually use
Today's scope, a material pull against the job, a restock request with quantity and urgency, hours, and a daily report. It queues offline and syncs when there is signal.
Field service
A specialty electrical contractor runs multi-year work from trucks. Each truck carries conduit, wire, breakers, and devices. Everything consumed has to hit the right contract and cost center. The ERP was fine at purchasing and job costing. It had no idea what was on a truck. So the field ran on text messages, and the warehouse spreadsheet was updated when someone had time.
Legacy ERP + mobile field app
01
Today's scope, a material pull against the job, a restock request with quantity and urgency, hours, and a daily report. It queues offline and syncs when there is signal.
02
Requested, awaiting approval, approved, picked, delivered, closed. Every request carries the contract and cost center, so approval shows the budget impact before anyone says yes.
03
Truck and warehouse stock share one inventory model with a location. Transfers are a movement, not an untracked event. The ERP remains the system of record; our layer proposes the consumption posting back to it.
Truck and warehouse stock share one inventory model with a location, so a transfer is a recorded movement rather than an untracked event. That is what stops material being re-ordered because nobody could see it sitting on another truck.
Yes, and that was the requirement here. The ERP was already good at purchasing and job costing and was never going to grow a truck-stock module. It stays the ledger; our layer captures the field data it never had and proposes the consumption posting back to it.
Yes. Crews record material pulls, restock requests, hours, and a daily report offline, and the app queues them and syncs when there is signal. A field app that needs coverage to work does not get used on a job site.
Every requisition carries the contract and cost center from the moment it is raised, and approval shows the budget impact before anyone says yes. That is the difference between a requisition and a text message: state, an owner, and a budget check.
Most businesses do not have a software problem because one tool is old. They have a problem because legacy systems, modern SaaS, spreadsheets, and manual steps were never designed to share one workflow.
Spreadsheets work until they do not. When teams copy data between tabs, chase version conflicts, and build workarounds in Excel, the problem is no longer the sheet — it is the lack of proper software built for the process.
Construction
Estimators were reading plans into spreadsheets, then emailing suppliers one by one. We built a desk where uploaded drawings become a reviewable material list, a quote, and a side-by-side RFQ — without another SaaS seat for each step.
Read the case studyLogistics
A freight team was running the day from Outlook, a TMS, and a status spreadsheet. We put an operations layer on top: inbound mail becomes a shipment, documents are readable, and the agent can explain what changed — with a human still on the send button.
Read the case studyTell us the tools, spreadsheets, or legacy systems in the way. We will say whether it should become one custom app.